We know how much an Asian elephant eats, but until today we didn’t know the biodiversity footprint of African elephants – that is, the literal biodiversity in the footprints left by these massive animals as they walk around, hopefully avoiding beehives. John Platt reports for Scientific American on the ecosystem engineers’ effects from walking:

When you weigh upwards of 6,000 kilograms, you tend to leave a trace of yourself wherever you walk. That’s definitely the case with African elephants (Loxodonta africana), which, according to new research, is actually a boon for dozens of other, much tinier, species.

As discussed in a paper published this week in the African Journal of Ecology, elephant feet play an important ecological role in Uganda, and probably in other countries. As elephants walk through the forest, they leave deep footprints behind them. These footprints then fill up with water, creating little foot-shaped microhabitats for at least 61 different microinvertebrate species from nine different orders.

Among those living in Footprint Land were species of mites, mayflies, backswimmers, leeches and gastropods. They also found a large number of tadpoles.

None of this has been observed before, although some previous research has linked elephant footprints to mosquito breeding sites, according to the paper.

The researchers, from Germany’s University of Koblenz-Landau and other institutions, did more than just discover this microinvertebrate community. They wanted to know just how much the tiny denizens relied on these elephant footprints. They measured the age of each footprint, as well as the temperature and pH of the water inside, as well as its distance to other footprints and natural bodies of water. They also created a series of artificial elephant footprints in order to test things even further.

All told, they found that the oldest footprints held the highest levels of biodiversity due to the added level of dead leaves that had fallen into the prints, as well as new vegetation that had started to grow. The oldest prints were also the only ones that contained tadpoles. Meanwhile, the medium-aged prints had the lowest biodiversity levels.

Read the rest of the article here.