Really? is a question we have to ask every now and then. We had no time to waste, because the country with the biggest carbon footprint per capita needed to change something(s) substantially to allow the planet a chance. But one senator stood in the way. Thanks to National Public Radio (USA) for laying out clearly what the stakes were, and now are:
What losing Build Back Better means for climate change
With billions of dollars for clean energy, the Build Back Better legislation has the potential to substantially and rapidly cut heat-trapping emissions in the U.S. But after West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin rejected the bill on Sunday, Build Back Better is effectively dead, at a time when scientists say the world can’t afford to wait on climate change.
“It’s really disheartening,” says Leah Stokes, associate professor of political science at University of California Santa Barbara. “We don’t have any more decades left to waste, and failure is not an option.”
The legislation earmarked $555 billion for renewable energy and clean transportation incentives over a decade, the country’s largest climate change investment ever. The policies are crucial for President Biden’s goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions 50-52% by 2030, compared to 2005 levels.
Even that goal may not be enough to avoid climate change’s most destructive impacts, scientists warn. The U.S. is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases worldwide, and the planet has already warmed by almost 2 degrees Fahrenheit, or 1.1 degrees Celsius.
By the end of the century, temperatures are currently on track for almost 5 degrees Fahrenheit of warming, setting the stage for more dangerous hurricanes and droughts, rising seas that would inundate coastal cities around the world, and the disappearance of entire ecosystems like coral reefs.
In the past year alone, deadly floods and heat waves took lives across the U.S. – extreme weather events that are only expected to intensify on a hotter planet. Over the summer, record-breaking heat killed more than 200 people in the Pacific Northwest. The temperatures, reaching 116 degrees in some places, would be “virtually impossible” without climate change, according to scientists with the World Weather Attribution collaborative…
Read the whole article here.
One thought on “Really, Joe?”
Pingback: Really, Joe? — Organikos | THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON...