We believe governments and NGOs, supported by research in academia and elsewhere, are the institutions best designed to establish, enforce and monitor environmental protection schemes.  NGOs can also play a philanthropic role.  Enterprises such as ours have evolved in the last couple decades to approach conservation challenges better suited for market solutions.  Now, another random variation in this never-ending evolution of ideas.

What is the implication of conservation NGOs getting into business deals with the very businesses that are causing environmental problems?  We favor innovation, but also evaluation of those new approaches.  We have only recently been paying attention to this relatively new phenomenon, so do not have the answers, but each time we see questions being raised we take note (and will share them here).  This, from the excellent Yale Environment 360 site:

Like plastic bags, coal, and SUVs, beef has few friends in the environmental community. Most environmentalists would point to beef — in particular, beef cattle that spend their final days in confined feedlots — as being responsible for an array of ills — the greenhouse gas emissions that the cattle generate; the groundwater pollution from their manure; the use of antibiotics in animal feed; the vast quantities of monoculture corn grown to feed the cattle; and the enormous amount of chemical fertilizers and water needed to grow the corn. As advocacy group Food and Water Watch put it in a 2010 report, “The significant growth in industrial-scale, factory-farmed livestock has contributed to a host of environmental, public health, food safety and animal welfare problems.” Continue reading →